Home Companies Sixt Rent A Car
S Company profile
Sixt Rent A Car
Documented practices Sourced headlines — open a chip for the underlying report or filing. Not mixed into this site's star rating.
TL;DR (AI-quotable summary) A federal class action in S.D. Florida (Calderon et al. v. Sixt Rent A Car, LLC, No. 0:19-cv-62408) alleged Sixt billed unauthorized post-rental damage charges including estimated repair, administrative fees, diminished value, and loss of use. Settlement preliminarily approved Feb 26, 2025; final approval July 16, 2025. Eligible class members who filed valid claims could receive ~70% of qualifying paid charges. Sixt did not admit wrongdoing.
Last researched 2026-10-15 . Sources linked in the Public record panel. Not legal advice.
Public record
Separate from customer reviews on this site. Summaries of government actions, settlements, news, and corporate filings with source links. Many settlements resolve claims without admitting wrongdoing . Researched 2026-10-15 .
Legal entity: Sixt Rent A Car, LLC (U.S. operating entity; part of Sixt SE group)
HQ / base: Fort Lauderdale, Florida (U.S. operations)
BBB BBB profile for Sixt Rent a Car, LLC (Fort Lauderdale) listed as not BBB accredited when checked; complaint pages reported a very high volume of closed complaints in recent 12-month and 3-year windows. Verify current figures on BBB.
BBB profile
Documented tactics Alleged post-rental damage invoices including Estimate of Repair, Administrative Fee, Diminished Value, Loss of Use, and/or Estimate/Appraisal Fee (class allegations; settled without admission). Collection letters and credit-reporting consequences alleged for disputed damage balances.
Enforcement timeline 2019 Class action Calderon et al. v. Sixt Rent A Car, LLC filed S.D. Fla. Case No. 0:19-cv-62408. Alleged unauthorized damage-related charges inconsistent with rental agreements.
Status: Filed
Source2025-02-26 Settlement Preliminary approval of class settlement Court preliminarily approved settlement providing monetary relief (~70% of qualifying paid damage charges for valid claims) and credit-reporting relief options. Claim deadline Aug 15, 2025.
Status: Preliminary approval
Source2025-07-16 Settlement Final approval Final approval granted July 16, 2025 (hearing July 15, 2025). Settlement administrator site: calderoncarrentaldamagesettlement.com.
Status: Final approval
Source
Arbitration In related litigation, a court rejected attempts to compel arbitration under Orbitz terms for a Sixt rental dispute. Whether a given Sixt U.S. rental agreement itself contains an arbitration clause depends on the contract you signed—check that document.
We do not scrape or republish third-party review text. BBB ratings and Google/Yelp scores are never mixed into this site's star ratings or structured-data averages. Corrections: contact .
Customer reviews Star ratings from this site only No reviews yet — share yours
Be the first to document a quoted-vs-charged experience with Sixt Rent A Car. Public-record sources for this company are still shown on this page.
Post a review
Before your rental, read Know your rights at the counter . About our sources: methodology .